WeekWeek 9
ScoringPPRHalf PPRStandardSuperflex PPR
Every wide receiver ranked for the rest of the 2026 season by real leagues' own Trade Values charts, as of week 9, in tiers. Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Puka Nacua, and Amon-Ra St. Brown lead PPR leagues.
By position: Quarterbacks Running backs Wide receivers Tight ends
PPR wide receiver rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73 | 27.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 64 | 23.1 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 56 | 20.1 | 100% | – |
| 4 | 55 | 18.3 | 100% | – |
| 5 | 50 | 21.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 44 | 19.9 | 100% | – |
| 7 | 40 | 17.8 | 100% | – |
| 8 | 40 | 17.2 | 100% | – |
| 9 | 39 | 17.5 | 100% | – |
| 10 | 37 | 15.2 | 100% | – |
| 11 | 34 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
| 12 | 33 | 18.4 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 33 | 14.8 | 100% | – |
| 14 | 31 | 15.6 | 100% | – |
| 15 | 28 | 13.7 | 100% | – |
| 16 | 27 | 13.6 | 100% | – |
| 17 | 27 | 11.3 | 100% | – |
| 18 | 26 | 17.3 | 100% | – |
| 19 | 25 | 14.2 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 22 | 13.0 | 100% | – |
| 21 | 22 | 16.4 | 100% | – |
| 22 | 21 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
| 23 | 21 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 17 | 13.2 | 100% | – |
| 25 | 16 | 8.6 | 98% | – |
| 26 | 15 | 11.8 | 100% | – |
| 27 | 14 | 13.6 | 100% | – |
| 28 | 13 | 13.7 | 99% | – |
| 29 | 11 | 10.6 | 100% | – |
| 30 | 10 | 9.8 | 98% | – |
| 31 | 9 | 12.1 | 91% | – |
| 32 | 7 | 12.5 | 98% | – |
| 33 | 6 | 9.1 | 96% | – |
| 34 | 6 | 6.4 | 100% | – |
| 35 | 5 | 11.0 | 77% | – |
| 36 | 4 | 4.8 | 59% | – |
| 37 | 4 | 9.7 | 100% | – |
| 38 | 4 | 8.2 | 88% | – |
| 39 | 3 | 9.5 | 83% | – |
| 40 | 3 | 8.7 | 89% | – |
| 41 | 3 | 9.3 | 85% | – |
| 42 | 3 | 10.9 | 76% | – |
| 43 | 3 | 9.7 | 82% | – |
| 44 | 2 | 10.2 | 78% | – |
| 45 | 2 | 10.6 | 80% | – |
| 46 | 2 | 8.0 | 89% | – |
| 47 | 2 | 8.7 | 74% | – |
| 48 | 2 | 5.4 | 35% | – |
| 49 | 1 | – | 69% | – |
| 50 | 1 | 4.2 | 13% | – |
| 51 | 1 | 12.2 | 77% | – |
| 52 | 1 | 8.3 | 76% | – |
| 53 | <1 | 4.1 | 20% | – |
| 54 | <1 | 17.0 | 96% | – |
| 55 | <1 | – | 11% | – |
| 56 | <1 | 5.3 | 44% | – |
| 57 | <1 | 0.0 | 38% | – |
| 58 | <1 | 7.8 | 55% | – |
| 59 | <1 | 11.9 | 63% | – |
| 60 | <1 | 7.7 | 69% | – |
| 61 | <1 | 4.5 | 49% | – |
| 62 | <1 | 6.7 | 26% | – |
| 63 | <1 | 3.6 | 24% | – |
| 64 | <1 | 7.5 | 11% | – |
| 65 | <1 | 9.7 | 66% | – |
| 66 | <1 | 9.5 | 29% | – |
| 67 | <1 | 7.9 | 22% | – |
| 68 | <1 | 5.0 | 24% | – |
| 69 | <1 | 6.1 | 73% | – |
| 70 | <1 | 12.3 | 86% | – |
| 71 | <1 | 9.6 | 66% | – |
| 72 | <1 | 6.0 | 41% | – |
| 73 | <1 | 9.5 | 72% | – |
| 74 | <1 | 9.0 | 30% | – |
| 75 | <1 | 8.9 | 37% | – |
| 76 | <1 | 5.6 | 85% | – |
| 77 | <1 | 12.1 | 33% | – |
| 78 | <1 | 10.2 | 75% | – |
| 79 | <1 | 5.5 | 51% | – |
| 80 | <1 | 4.9 | 16% | – |
| 81 | <1 | 3.2 | 32% | – |
| 82 | <1 | 0.0 | 20% | – |
| 83 | <1 | 6.5 | 47% | – |
| 84 | <1 | 9.0 | 14% | – |
| 85 | <1 | 6.0 | 70% | – |
| 86 | <1 | 6.5 | 31% | – |
| 87 | <1 | 6.6 | 86% | – |
| 88 | <1 | 9.2 | 40% | – |
| 89 | <1 | 7.9 | 23% | – |
| 90 | <1 | – | 40% | – |
Half PPR wide receiver rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66 | 27.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 54 | 23.1 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 48 | 18.3 | 100% | – |
| 4 | 47 | 20.1 | 100% | – |
| 5 | 43 | 21.0 | 100% | – |
| 6 | 40 | 19.9 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 36 | 17.5 | 100% | – |
| 8 | 34 | 15.2 | 100% | – |
| 9 | 34 | 17.8 | 100% | – |
| 10 | 33 | 17.2 | 100% | – |
| 11 | 31 | 18.4 | 100% | – |
| 12 | 30 | 14.8 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 30 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 26 | 15.6 | 100% | – |
| 15 | 25 | 13.6 | 100% | – |
| 16 | 23 | 13.7 | 100% | – |
| 17 | 23 | 17.3 | 100% | – |
| 18 | 22 | 11.3 | 100% | – |
| 19 | 21 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
| 20 | 21 | 14.2 | 100% | – |
| 21 | 19 | 16.4 | 100% | – |
| 22 | 19 | 13.0 | 100% | – |
| 23 | 18 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 14 | 8.6 | 98% | – |
| 25 | 14 | 13.2 | 100% | – |
| 26 | 13 | 11.8 | 100% | – |
| 27 | 11 | 13.7 | 99% | – |
| 28 | 11 | 13.6 | 100% | – |
| 29 | 9 | 10.6 | 100% | – |
| 30 | 8 | 9.8 | 98% | – |
| 31 | 7 | 12.1 | 91% | – |
| 32 | 5 | 12.5 | 98% | – |
| 33 | 5 | 6.4 | 100% | – |
| 34 | 5 | 9.1 | 96% | – |
| 35 | 5 | 4.8 | 59% | – |
| 36 | 3 | 9.7 | 100% | – |
| 37 | 3 | 11.0 | 77% | – |
| 38 | 3 | 8.2 | 88% | – |
| 39 | 3 | 10.9 | 76% | – |
| 40 | 2 | 9.3 | 85% | – |
| 41 | 2 | 9.7 | 82% | – |
| 42 | 2 | 8.7 | 89% | – |
| 43 | 1 | 10.2 | 78% | – |
| 44 | 1 | 8.0 | 89% | – |
| 45 | 1 | 8.7 | 74% | – |
| 46 | 1 | 10.6 | 80% | – |
| 47 | 1 | 9.5 | 83% | – |
| 48 | 1 | – | 69% | – |
| 49 | 1 | 12.2 | 77% | – |
| 50 | 1 | 8.3 | 76% | – |
| 51 | 1 | 5.4 | 35% | – |
| 52 | <1 | 6.5 | 31% | – |
| 53 | <1 | 6.6 | 86% | – |
| 54 | <1 | 7.9 | 23% | – |
| 55 | <1 | – | 40% | – |
| 56 | <1 | 9.7 | 6% | – |
| 57 | <1 | 6.7 | 26% | – |
| 58 | <1 | 17.0 | 96% | – |
| 59 | <1 | 7.5 | 11% | – |
| 60 | <1 | 9.7 | 66% | – |
| 61 | <1 | 7.9 | 22% | – |
| 62 | <1 | 7.8 | 55% | – |
| 63 | <1 | 6.1 | 73% | – |
| 64 | <1 | 11.9 | 63% | – |
| 65 | <1 | 7.7 | 69% | – |
| 66 | <1 | 4.2 | 13% | – |
| 67 | <1 | 9.6 | 66% | – |
| 68 | <1 | 6.0 | 41% | – |
| 69 | <1 | 3.2 | 32% | – |
| 70 | <1 | 12.1 | 33% | – |
| 71 | <1 | 5.6 | 85% | – |
| 72 | <1 | 9.0 | 30% | – |
| 73 | <1 | 8.9 | 37% | – |
| 74 | <1 | 9.5 | 72% | – |
| 75 | <1 | 10.2 | 75% | – |
| 76 | <1 | 5.5 | 51% | – |
| 77 | <1 | 4.9 | 16% | – |
| 78 | <1 | 12.3 | 86% | – |
| 79 | <1 | 9.2 | 40% | – |
| 80 | <1 | 6.0 | 70% | – |
| 81 | <1 | – | 11% | – |
| 82 | <1 | 5.3 | 44% | – |
| 83 | <1 | 6.5 | 47% | – |
Standard wide receiver rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | 27.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 45 | 23.1 | 100% | – |
| 3 | 41 | 18.3 | 100% | – |
| 4 | 38 | 20.1 | 100% | – |
| 5 | 37 | 19.9 | 100% | – |
| 6 | 36 | 21.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 31 | 17.5 | 100% | – |
| 8 | 31 | 15.2 | 100% | – |
| 9 | 30 | 18.4 | 100% | – |
| 10 | 29 | 14.8 | 100% | – |
| 11 | 28 | 17.8 | 100% | – |
| 12 | 26 | 17.2 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 25 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
| 14 | 24 | 13.6 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 21 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
| 16 | 21 | 15.6 | 100% | – |
| 17 | 19 | 13.7 | 100% | – |
| 18 | 19 | 17.3 | 100% | – |
| 19 | 17 | 11.3 | 100% | – |
| 20 | 17 | 16.4 | 100% | – |
| 21 | 16 | 14.2 | 100% | – |
| 22 | 15 | 13.0 | 100% | – |
| 23 | 14 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 11 | 8.6 | 98% | – |
| 25 | 11 | 13.2 | 100% | – |
| 26 | 10 | 11.8 | 100% | – |
| 27 | 9 | 10.6 | 100% | – |
| 28 | 9 | 13.7 | 99% | – |
| 29 | 7 | 13.6 | 100% | – |
| 30 | 7 | 12.1 | 91% | – |
| 31 | 6 | 9.8 | 98% | – |
| 32 | 5 | 12.5 | 98% | – |
| 33 | 5 | 4.8 | 59% | – |
| 34 | 4 | 6.4 | 100% | – |
| 35 | 4 | 9.1 | 96% | – |
| 36 | 2 | 9.7 | 100% | – |
| 37 | 2 | 8.2 | 88% | – |
| 38 | 1 | 9.3 | 85% | – |
| 39 | 1 | 9.7 | 82% | – |
| 40 | 1 | 10.2 | 78% | – |
| 41 | 1 | 10.6 | 80% | – |
| 42 | 1 | 8.7 | 89% | – |
| 43 | 1 | 8.0 | 89% | – |
| 44 | 1 | 9.5 | 83% | – |
| 45 | <1 | 12.3 | 86% | – |
| 46 | <1 | 6.6 | 86% | – |
| 47 | <1 | 9.6 | 66% | – |
| 48 | <1 | 12.1 | 33% | – |
| 49 | <1 | 10.2 | 75% | – |
| 50 | <1 | 9.5 | 72% | – |
| 51 | <1 | 5.4 | 35% | – |
| 52 | <1 | 17.0 | 96% | – |
| 53 | <1 | 5.6 | 85% | – |
| 54 | <1 | 6.1 | 73% | – |
| 55 | <1 | 6.0 | 70% | – |
| 56 | <1 | 9.7 | 66% | – |
Superflex PPR wide receiver rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 | 27.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 62 | 23.1 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 53 | 20.1 | 100% | – |
| 4 | 53 | 18.3 | 100% | – |
| 5 | 48 | 21.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 42 | 19.9 | 100% | – |
| 7 | 38 | 17.8 | 100% | – |
| 8 | 38 | 17.2 | 100% | – |
| 9 | 38 | 17.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 33 | 15.2 | 100% | – |
| 11 | 31 | 18.4 | 100% | – |
| 12 | 30 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 29 | 14.8 | 100% | – |
| 14 | 28 | 15.6 | 100% | – |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 25 | 13.7 | 100% | – |
| 16 | 24 | 13.6 | 100% | – |
| 17 | 24 | 17.3 | 100% | – |
| 18 | 23 | 11.3 | 100% | – |
| 19 | 21 | 14.2 | 100% | – |
| 20 | 19 | 16.4 | 100% | – |
| 21 | 19 | 13.0 | 100% | – |
| 22 | 18 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
| 23 | 18 | 14.4 | 100% | – |
Tier 7
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 13 | 13.2 | 100% | – |
| 25 | 12 | 8.6 | 98% | – |
| 26 | 12 | 11.8 | 100% | – |
| 27 | 10 | 13.6 | 100% | – |
| 28 | 9 | 13.7 | 99% | – |
| 29 | 7 | 12.1 | 91% | – |
| 30 | 6 | 9.8 | 98% | – |
| 31 | 6 | 10.6 | 100% | – |
| 32 | 6 | 11.0 | 77% | – |
| 33 | 5 | 12.5 | 98% | – |
| 34 | 5 | 6.4 | 100% | – |
| 35 | 4 | 4.8 | 59% | – |
| 36 | 3 | 9.1 | 96% | – |
| 37 | 3 | 5.4 | 35% | – |
| 38 | 2 | 9.3 | 85% | – |
| 39 | 2 | 8.7 | 89% | – |
| 40 | 2 | 10.2 | 78% | – |
| 41 | 2 | 9.7 | 82% | – |
| 42 | 2 | 10.6 | 80% | – |
| 43 | 1 | 9.7 | 100% | – |
| 44 | 1 | 9.5 | 83% | – |
| 45 | 1 | 8.0 | 89% | – |
| 46 | 1 | – | 69% | – |
| 47 | 1 | 8.2 | 88% | – |
| 48 | <1 | 9.6 | 66% | – |
| 49 | <1 | 9.5 | 72% | – |
| 50 | <1 | 9.7 | 66% | – |
| 51 | <1 | 6.0 | 70% | – |
| 52 | <1 | 17.0 | 96% | – |
| 53 | <1 | 10.2 | 75% | – |
| 54 | <1 | 6.6 | 86% | – |
| 55 | <1 | 6.1 | 73% | – |
| 56 | <1 | 12.1 | 33% | – |
| 57 | <1 | 5.6 | 85% | – |
| 58 | <1 | 12.3 | 86% | – |
Value: the points a week a player adds over the best waiver pickup at his position for the rest of the season, the median across real redraft leagues' own Trade Values charts, with the top player at 100. Tiers break where value drops by a tenth. Rostered: the share of leagues with him on a roster in the latest finished week.
Common questions
Who is the WR1 rest of season?
In week 9 PPR leagues, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, then Puka Nacua and Amon-Ra St. Brown.
How are these rankings made?
From the median of real leagues' own Trade Values charts: the points a week each player adds over the best waiver pickup at his position for the rest of the season. Tiers break where value drops by a tenth.