WeekWeek 9
ScoringPPRHalf PPRStandardSuperflex PPR
Every running back ranked for the rest of the 2026 season by real leagues' own Trade Values charts, as of week 9, in tiers. Jahmyr Gibbs, Christian McCaffrey, and Kenneth Walker III lead PPR leagues.
By position: Quarterbacks Running backs Wide receivers Tight ends
PPR running back rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 28.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 71 | 20.6 | 100% | – |
| 3 | 71 | 22.9 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 62 | 19.2 | 100% | – |
| 5 | 56 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 50 | 18.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 44 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
| 8 | 42 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 9 | 42 | 19.0 | 100% | – |
| 10 | 41 | 16.5 | 100% | – |
| 11 | 41 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
| 12 | 40 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 39 | 17.6 | 100% | – |
| 14 | 39 | 13.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 34 | 16.9 | 100% | – |
| 16 | 34 | 16.3 | 100% | – |
Tier 7
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 24 | 14.6 | 100% | – |
| 18 | 23 | 10.1 | 99% | – |
| 19 | 23 | 14.2 | 100% | – |
Tier 8
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 20 | 12.4 | 100% | – |
| 21 | 20 | 8.9 | 99% | – |
| 22 | 19 | 8.4 | 100% | – |
| 23 | 19 | 12.4 | 100% | – |
| 24 | 17 | 9.1 | 94% | – |
| 25 | 17 | 14.8 | 95% | – |
| 26 | 16 | 21.6 | 100% | – |
Tier 9
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 12 | 11.4 | 98% | – |
Tier 10
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 9 | 10.5 | 97% | – |
| 29 | 8 | 8.9 | 91% | – |
| 30 | 6 | 12.4 | 99% | – |
| 31 | 5 | 10.3 | 100% | – |
| 32 | 5 | 10.3 | 98% | – |
| 33 | 4 | 7.4 | 93% | – |
| 34 | 4 | 6.9 | 97% | – |
| 35 | 3 | 6.5 | 47% | – |
| 36 | 3 | 4.9 | 70% | – |
| 37 | 3 | 10.3 | 96% | – |
| 38 | 2 | 6.6 | 64% | – |
| 39 | 2 | 5.9 | 97% | – |
| 40 | 2 | 10.5 | 76% | – |
| 41 | 1 | 8.9 | 94% | – |
| 42 | 1 | 8.4 | 40% | – |
| 43 | 1 | 8.9 | 78% | – |
| 44 | 1 | 5.6 | 87% | – |
| 45 | 1 | 3.9 | 12% | – |
| 46 | 1 | 6.2 | 43% | – |
| 47 | 1 | 8.2 | 40% | – |
| 48 | <1 | 2.7 | 63% | – |
| 49 | <1 | 4.4 | 58% | – |
| 50 | <1 | 11.0 | 74% | – |
| 51 | <1 | 7.3 | 45% | – |
| 52 | <1 | 4.7 | 47% | – |
| 53 | <1 | 7.1 | 22% | – |
| 54 | <1 | 3.1 | 39% | – |
| 55 | <1 | 10.0 | 34% | – |
| 56 | <1 | 9.0 | 75% | – |
| 57 | <1 | 11.2 | 90% | – |
| 58 | <1 | 7.9 | 49% | – |
| 59 | <1 | 4.6 | 17% | – |
| 60 | <1 | 8.8 | 56% | – |
| 61 | <1 | – | 27% | – |
| 62 | <1 | 3.3 | 9% | – |
| 63 | <1 | 4.6 | 33% | – |
| 64 | <1 | 5.6 | 45% | – |
| 65 | <1 | 4.3 | 29% | – |
| 66 | <1 | 4.7 | 51% | – |
| 67 | <1 | 4.5 | 40% | – |
| 68 | <1 | 1.6 | 14% | – |
| 69 | <1 | 6.1 | 40% | – |
| 70 | <1 | 9.3 | 87% | – |
Half PPR running back rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 28.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 72 | 22.9 | 100% | – |
| 3 | 69 | 20.6 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 62 | 19.2 | 100% | – |
| 5 | 62 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 54 | 18.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 48 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 8 | 45 | 19.0 | 100% | – |
| 9 | 45 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
| 10 | 44 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
| 11 | 42 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 12 | 42 | 17.6 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 40 | 16.5 | 100% | – |
| 14 | 39 | 16.9 | 100% | – |
| 15 | 36 | 16.3 | 100% | – |
| 16 | 36 | 13.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 28 | 14.6 | 100% | – |
| 18 | 27 | 10.1 | 99% | – |
| 19 | 25 | 14.2 | 100% | – |
| 20 | 24 | 8.9 | 99% | – |
| 21 | 23 | 8.4 | 100% | – |
| 22 | 22 | 12.4 | 100% | – |
| 23 | 22 | 9.1 | 94% | – |
| 24 | 21 | 14.8 | 95% | – |
| 25 | 21 | 12.4 | 100% | – |
Tier 7
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 18 | 21.6 | 100% | – |
Tier 8
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 15 | 11.4 | 98% | – |
Tier 9
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 11 | 10.5 | 97% | – |
| 29 | 10 | 8.9 | 91% | – |
| 30 | 10 | 10.3 | 98% | – |
| 31 | 9 | 6.9 | 97% | – |
| 32 | 8 | 12.4 | 99% | – |
| 33 | 7 | 7.4 | 93% | – |
| 34 | 6 | 6.5 | 47% | – |
| 35 | 6 | 10.3 | 100% | – |
| 36 | 5 | 4.9 | 70% | – |
| 37 | 3 | 10.3 | 96% | – |
| 38 | 3 | 5.9 | 97% | – |
| 39 | 3 | 10.5 | 76% | – |
| 40 | 2 | 5.6 | 87% | – |
| 41 | 2 | 9.3 | 87% | – |
| 42 | 2 | 8.9 | 94% | – |
| 43 | 1 | 6.2 | 43% | – |
| 44 | 1 | 8.9 | 78% | – |
| 45 | 1 | 8.4 | 40% | – |
| 46 | 1 | 6.6 | 64% | – |
| 47 | 1 | 8.2 | 40% | – |
| 48 | 1 | 11.0 | 84% | – |
| 49 | 1 | 3.9 | 12% | – |
| 50 | 1 | 11.0 | 74% | – |
| 51 | <1 | – | 23% | – |
| 52 | <1 | 7.1 | 22% | – |
| 53 | <1 | 3.1 | 39% | – |
| 54 | <1 | 10.0 | 34% | – |
| 55 | <1 | 2.7 | 63% | – |
| 56 | <1 | 4.4 | 58% | – |
| 57 | <1 | 7.3 | 45% | – |
| 58 | <1 | 4.7 | 47% | – |
| 59 | <1 | 8.8 | 56% | – |
| 60 | <1 | 9.0 | 75% | – |
| 61 | <1 | – | 27% | – |
| 62 | <1 | 4.7 | 51% | – |
| 63 | <1 | 4.3 | 29% | – |
| 64 | <1 | 4.0 | 27% | – |
| 65 | <1 | 11.2 | 90% | – |
| 66 | <1 | 4.5 | 40% | – |
| 67 | <1 | 6.1 | 40% | – |
| 68 | <1 | 5.6 | 45% | – |
| 69 | <1 | 4.6 | 33% | – |
| 70 | <1 | 6.4 | 51% | – |
Standard running back rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 28.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 75 | 22.9 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 67 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
| 4 | 64 | 20.6 | 100% | – |
| 5 | 62 | 19.2 | 100% | – |
| 6 | 56 | 18.0 | 100% | – |
| 7 | 52 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 46 | 19.0 | 100% | – |
| 9 | 44 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
| 10 | 44 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 11 | 43 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
| 12 | 41 | 17.6 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 41 | 16.9 | 100% | – |
| 14 | 39 | 16.3 | 100% | – |
| 15 | 36 | 16.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 30 | 14.6 | 100% | – |
| 17 | 29 | 13.0 | 100% | – |
| 18 | 27 | 10.1 | 99% | – |
| 19 | 25 | 14.2 | 100% | – |
| 20 | 24 | 8.4 | 100% | – |
| 21 | 24 | 14.8 | 95% | – |
| 22 | 23 | 8.9 | 99% | – |
| 23 | 22 | 9.1 | 94% | – |
| 24 | 20 | 12.4 | 100% | – |
| 25 | 19 | 12.4 | 100% | – |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 16 | 21.6 | 100% | – |
| 27 | 14 | 11.4 | 98% | – |
| 28 | 12 | 6.9 | 97% | – |
| 29 | 11 | 10.3 | 98% | – |
| 30 | 9 | 12.4 | 99% | – |
| 31 | 9 | 10.5 | 97% | – |
| 32 | 8 | 8.9 | 91% | – |
| 33 | 6 | 7.4 | 93% | – |
| 34 | 6 | 10.3 | 100% | – |
| 35 | 5 | 6.5 | 47% | – |
| 36 | 4 | 10.3 | 96% | – |
| 37 | 4 | 6.2 | 43% | – |
| 38 | 3 | 10.5 | 76% | – |
| 39 | 3 | 5.9 | 97% | – |
| 40 | 2 | 8.9 | 94% | – |
| 41 | 2 | 5.6 | 87% | – |
| 42 | 2 | 8.2 | 40% | – |
| 43 | 1 | 8.4 | 40% | – |
| 44 | 1 | 6.6 | 64% | – |
| 45 | 1 | 9.3 | 87% | – |
| 46 | <1 | 5.8 | 49% | – |
| 47 | <1 | 11.0 | 84% | – |
| 48 | <1 | 11.2 | 90% | – |
| 49 | <1 | 7.9 | 49% | – |
| 50 | <1 | 8.8 | 56% | – |
| 51 | <1 | 6.1 | 40% | – |
| 52 | <1 | 6.4 | 51% | – |
| 53 | <1 | 4.7 | 51% | – |
| 54 | <1 | 9.0 | 75% | – |
Superflex PPR running back rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 28.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 70 | 22.9 | 100% | – |
| 3 | 69 | 20.6 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 61 | 19.2 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 54 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 48 | 18.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 42 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
| 8 | 40 | 19.0 | 100% | – |
| 9 | 39 | 18.8 | 100% | – |
| 10 | 39 | 16.5 | 100% | – |
| 11 | 39 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 12 | 38 | 17.6 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 38 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 14 | 36 | 13.0 | 100% | – |
| 15 | 33 | 16.3 | 100% | – |
| 16 | 33 | 16.9 | 100% | – |
Tier 7
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 23 | 14.6 | 100% | – |
| 18 | 22 | 14.2 | 100% | – |
| 19 | 22 | 10.1 | 99% | – |
Tier 8
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 18 | 12.4 | 100% | – |
| 21 | 17 | 12.4 | 100% | – |
| 22 | 17 | 8.4 | 100% | – |
| 23 | 16 | 8.9 | 99% | – |
| 24 | 16 | 14.8 | 95% | – |
| 25 | 15 | 9.1 | 94% | – |
| 26 | 13 | 21.6 | 100% | – |
| 27 | 11 | 11.4 | 98% | – |
Tier 9
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 6 | 10.5 | 97% | – |
| 29 | 6 | 8.9 | 91% | – |
| 30 | 6 | 12.4 | 99% | – |
| 31 | 4 | 10.3 | 100% | – |
| 32 | 3 | 4.9 | 70% | – |
| 33 | 3 | 10.3 | 98% | – |
| 34 | 3 | 10.3 | 96% | – |
| 35 | 2 | 6.5 | 47% | – |
| 36 | 2 | 5.9 | 97% | – |
| 37 | 2 | 6.9 | 97% | – |
| 38 | 2 | 8.9 | 78% | – |
| 39 | 1 | 8.4 | 40% | – |
| 40 | 1 | 7.4 | 93% | – |
| 41 | 1 | 6.6 | 64% | – |
| 42 | 1 | 8.2 | 40% | – |
| 43 | 1 | 8.9 | 94% | – |
| 44 | 1 | 10.5 | 76% | – |
| 45 | <1 | 4.5 | 40% | – |
| 46 | <1 | 11.0 | 84% | – |
| 47 | <1 | 6.4 | 51% | – |
| 48 | <1 | 4.7 | 51% | – |
| 49 | <1 | 6.2 | 43% | – |
| 50 | <1 | 11.2 | 90% | – |
| 51 | <1 | 9.0 | 75% | – |
| 52 | <1 | 5.6 | 87% | – |
| 53 | <1 | 7.9 | 49% | – |
Value: the points a week a player adds over the best waiver pickup at his position for the rest of the season, the median across real redraft leagues' own Trade Values charts, with the top player at 100. Tiers break where value drops by a tenth. Rostered: the share of leagues with him on a roster in the latest finished week.
Common questions
Who is the RB1 rest of season?
In week 9 PPR leagues, Jahmyr Gibbs, then Christian McCaffrey and Kenneth Walker III.
How are these rankings made?
From the median of real leagues' own Trade Values charts: the points a week each player adds over the best waiver pickup at his position for the rest of the season. Tiers break where value drops by a tenth.