WeekWeek 10
ScoringPPRHalf PPRStandardSuperflex PPR
Every wide receiver ranked for the rest of the 2026 season by real leagues' own Trade Values charts, as of week 10, in tiers. Puka Nacua, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, and Ja'Marr Chase lead PPR leagues.
By position: Quarterbacks Running backs Wide receivers Tight ends
PPR wide receiver rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68 | 24.8 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 2 | 67 | 25.8 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 3 | 63 | 20.0 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 4 | 57 | 19.7 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 5 | 56 | 22.4 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 46 | 20.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 41 | 17.7 | 100% | – |
| 8 | 38 | 15.3 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 9 | 37 | 16.2 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 10 | 37 | 19.7 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 11 | 35 | 15.9 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 12 | 32 | 13.6 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 13 | 31 | 14.8 | 100% | – |
| 14 | 31 | 15.6 | 100% | – |
| 15 | 29 | 17.3 | 100% | ▲ 3 |
| 16 | 27 | 15.1 | 100% | ▲ 7 |
| 17 | 26 | 11.0 | 100% | – |
| 18 | 26 | 18.2 | 100% | ▲ 3 |
| 19 | 25 | 13.7 | 100% | ▼ 3 |
| 20 | 25 | 13.5 | 100% | ▼ 5 |
| 21 | 23 | 14.2 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 22 | 22 | 13.0 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | 19 | 13.2 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 15 | 8.6 | 99% | ▲ 1 |
| 25 | 13 | 11.1 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 26 | 13 | 12.3 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 27 | 11 | 12.9 | 99% | ▲ 1 |
| 28 | 10 | 11.0 | 77% | ▲ 7 |
| 29 | 9 | 9.1 | 99% | ▲ 1 |
| 30 | 9 | 9.9 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 31 | 8 | 13.4 | 99% | ▼ 4 |
| 32 | 7 | 9.9 | 98% | ▲ 1 |
| 33 | 5 | 12.1 | 94% | ▼ 1 |
| 34 | 5 | 4.2 | 60% | ▲ 2 |
| 35 | 4 | 12.1 | 93% | ▼ 4 |
| 36 | 3 | 9.5 | 84% | ▲ 3 |
| 37 | 3 | 9.7 | 78% | ▲ 6 |
| 38 | 3 | 9.7 | 98% | ▼ 1 |
| 39 | 2 | 8.3 | 85% | ▲ 7 |
| 40 | 1 | 6.5 | 36% | ▲ 8 |
| 41 | 1 | 9.5 | 82% | – |
| 42 | 1 | 11.4 | 76% | – |
| 43 | 1 | 5.0 | 71% | ▲ 6 |
| 44 | 1 | 12.5 | 74% | ▲ 7 |
| 45 | 1 | 8.9 | 59% | ▲ 28 |
| 46 | 1 | 9.5 | 86% | ▼ 2 |
| 47 | 1 | 7.1 | 68% | ▲ 38 |
| 48 | 1 | 8.3 | 70% | ▲ 4 |
| 49 | 1 | 9.5 | 23% | – |
| 50 | 1 | 9.8 | 73% | ▼ 3 |
| 51 | <1 | 4.3 | 18% | ▲ 2 |
| 52 | <1 | 17.0 | 97% | ▲ 2 |
| 53 | <1 | 10.1 | 87% | ▼ 8 |
| 54 | <1 | – | 34% | ▲ 1 |
| 55 | <1 | 5.3 | 43% | ▲ 1 |
| 56 | <1 | 0.0 | 39% | ▲ 1 |
| 57 | <1 | 7.5 | 60% | ▲ 1 |
| 58 | <1 | 12.1 | 62% | ▲ 1 |
| 59 | <1 | 6.2 | 23% | ▲ 3 |
| 60 | <1 | 8.2 | 67% | – |
| 61 | <1 | 3.6 | 37% | – |
| 62 | <1 | 7.0 | 20% | ▲ 2 |
| 63 | <1 | 9.7 | 63% | ▲ 2 |
| 64 | <1 | 3.7 | 16% | ▼ 1 |
| 65 | <1 | 6.4 | 16% | – |
| 66 | <1 | 9.5 | 24% | – |
| 67 | <1 | 7.9 | 26% | – |
| 68 | <1 | 6.7 | 22% | – |
| 69 | <1 | 6.1 | 70% | – |
| 70 | <1 | 11.2 | 84% | – |
| 71 | <1 | 4.0 | 13% | ▼ 21 |
| 72 | <1 | 9.3 | 79% | ▼ 1 |
| 73 | <1 | 6.0 | 38% | ▼ 1 |
| 74 | <1 | 9.0 | 28% | – |
| 75 | <1 | 5.4 | 82% | ▲ 1 |
| 76 | <1 | 9.7 | 87% | ▲ 1 |
| 77 | <1 | 8.9 | 32% | ▼ 2 |
| 78 | <1 | 8.3 | 90% | ▼ 38 |
| 79 | <1 | 10.7 | 80% | ▼ 1 |
| 80 | <1 | 13.0 | 47% | ▼ 1 |
| 81 | <1 | 7.9 | 15% | ▼ 1 |
| 82 | <1 | 7.7 | 90% | ▼ 44 |
| 83 | <1 | 3.2 | 30% | ▼ 2 |
| 84 | <1 | 6.5 | 19% | ▼ 1 |
| 85 | <1 | 9.7 | 22% | ▼ 1 |
| 86 | <1 | 6.4 | 30% | – |
| 87 | <1 | 6.4 | 75% | – |
| 88 | <1 | 7.9 | 22% | ▲ 1 |
| 89 | <1 | 6.4 | 99% | ▼ 55 |
| 90 | <1 | – | 34% | – |
Half PPR wide receiver rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | 25.8 | 100% | – |
| 2 | 58 | 24.8 | 100% | – |
| 3 | 56 | 20.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 49 | 22.4 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 5 | 47 | 19.7 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 6 | 43 | 20.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 36 | 15.3 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 8 | 35 | 17.7 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 9 | 35 | 19.7 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 31 | 16.2 | 100% | – |
| 11 | 31 | 15.9 | 100% | ▼ 4 |
| 12 | 29 | 14.8 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 28 | 13.6 | 100% | – |
| 14 | 27 | 15.6 | 100% | – |
| 15 | 25 | 17.3 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 16 | 25 | 13.7 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 17 | 23 | 15.1 | 100% | ▲ 6 |
| 18 | 23 | 18.2 | 100% | ▲ 3 |
| 19 | 22 | 11.0 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 20 | 21 | 13.5 | 100% | ▼ 4 |
| 21 | 19 | 13.0 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 22 | 19 | 14.2 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 23 | 19 | 13.2 | 100% | ▼ 4 |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 13 | 8.6 | 99% | – |
| 25 | 11 | 11.1 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 26 | 10 | 12.3 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 27 | 9 | 9.9 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 28 | 9 | 12.9 | 99% | ▼ 1 |
| 29 | 7 | 9.9 | 98% | ▲ 5 |
| 30 | 7 | 9.1 | 99% | – |
| 31 | 6 | 11.0 | 77% | ▲ 6 |
| 32 | 6 | 13.4 | 99% | ▼ 4 |
| 33 | 5 | 4.2 | 60% | ▲ 2 |
| 34 | 4 | 12.1 | 93% | ▼ 3 |
| 35 | 3 | 12.1 | 94% | ▼ 3 |
| 36 | 2 | 11.4 | 76% | ▲ 3 |
| 37 | 1 | 9.7 | 78% | ▲ 4 |
| 38 | 1 | 12.5 | 74% | ▲ 11 |
| 39 | 1 | 8.3 | 85% | ▲ 5 |
| 40 | 1 | 9.7 | 98% | ▼ 4 |
| 41 | 1 | 9.5 | 82% | ▼ 1 |
| 42 | 1 | 9.5 | 84% | ▲ 5 |
| 43 | 1 | 8.3 | 70% | ▲ 7 |
| 44 | 1 | 6.5 | 36% | ▲ 7 |
| 45 | 1 | 8.9 | 59% | ▲ 29 |
| 46 | 1 | 9.8 | 73% | ▼ 1 |
| 47 | 1 | 9.5 | 23% | – |
| 48 | 1 | 7.1 | 68% | ▲ 32 |
| 49 | 1 | 5.0 | 71% | ▼ 1 |
| 50 | <1 | 8.2 | 67% | ▲ 15 |
| 51 | <1 | 12.1 | 62% | ▲ 13 |
| 52 | <1 | 9.5 | 86% | ▼ 9 |
| 53 | <1 | 10.1 | 87% | ▼ 7 |
| 54 | <1 | 17.0 | 97% | ▲ 4 |
| 55 | <1 | 8.2 | 36% | ▲ 1 |
| 56 | <1 | – | 34% | ▼ 1 |
| 57 | <1 | 7.9 | 22% | ▼ 3 |
| 58 | <1 | 6.4 | 75% | ▼ 5 |
| 59 | <1 | 6.4 | 30% | ▼ 7 |
| 60 | <1 | 9.7 | 22% | – |
| 61 | <1 | 9.3 | 79% | ▲ 6 |
| 62 | <1 | 6.4 | 99% | ▼ 29 |
| 63 | <1 | 9.2 | 37% | ▲ 16 |
| 64 | <1 | – | 34% | ▲ 17 |
| 65 | <1 | 9.0 | 28% | ▲ 7 |
| 66 | <1 | 3.2 | 30% | ▲ 3 |
| 67 | <1 | 5.3 | 43% | ▲ 15 |
| 68 | <1 | 7.5 | 60% | ▼ 6 |
| 69 | <1 | 6.2 | 23% | ▼ 12 |
| 70 | <1 | 11.2 | 84% | ▲ 8 |
| 71 | <1 | 7.0 | 20% | ▼ 12 |
| 72 | <1 | 9.7 | 63% | ▼ 12 |
| 73 | <1 | 9.7 | 87% | ▼ 3 |
| 74 | <1 | 5.4 | 82% | ▼ 3 |
| 75 | <1 | 7.9 | 26% | ▼ 14 |
| 76 | <1 | 6.1 | 70% | ▼ 13 |
| 77 | <1 | 6.0 | 38% | ▼ 9 |
| 78 | <1 | 8.9 | 32% | ▼ 5 |
| 79 | <1 | 8.3 | 90% | ▼ 37 |
| 80 | <1 | 10.7 | 80% | ▼ 5 |
| 81 | <1 | 13.0 | 47% | ▼ 5 |
| 82 | <1 | 7.9 | 15% | ▼ 5 |
| 83 | <1 | 7.7 | 90% | ▼ 45 |
Standard wide receiver rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56 | 25.8 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 50 | 20.0 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 3 | 49 | 24.8 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 43 | 22.4 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 5 | 40 | 20.0 | 100% | – |
| 6 | 39 | 19.7 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 35 | 19.7 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 8 | 33 | 15.3 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 29 | 17.7 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 10 | 28 | 14.8 | 100% | – |
| 11 | 27 | 15.9 | 100% | ▼ 4 |
| 12 | 25 | 16.2 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 25 | 13.7 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 14 | 24 | 13.6 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 15 | 22 | 18.2 | 100% | ▲ 5 |
| 16 | 22 | 15.6 | 100% | – |
| 17 | 22 | 17.3 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 18 | 20 | 15.1 | 100% | ▲ 5 |
| 19 | 20 | 13.2 | 100% | ▼ 4 |
| 20 | 18 | 13.5 | 100% | ▼ 3 |
| 21 | 17 | 11.0 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 22 | 16 | 13.0 | 100% | – |
| 23 | 16 | 14.2 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 12 | 8.6 | 99% | – |
Tier 7
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 9 | 11.1 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 26 | 9 | 12.3 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 27 | 9 | 9.9 | 100% | – |
| 28 | 7 | 9.9 | 98% | ▲ 7 |
| 29 | 7 | 9.1 | 99% | ▲ 2 |
| 30 | 7 | 12.9 | 99% | ▼ 2 |
| 31 | 5 | 12.1 | 94% | ▲ 1 |
| 32 | 5 | 12.1 | 93% | ▼ 2 |
| 33 | 5 | 4.2 | 60% | – |
| 34 | 3 | 13.4 | 99% | ▼ 5 |
| 35 | 1 | 9.5 | 84% | ▲ 9 |
| 36 | 1 | 8.3 | 85% | ▲ 7 |
| 37 | 1 | 7.1 | 68% | ▲ 18 |
| 38 | 1 | 9.7 | 98% | ▼ 2 |
| 39 | 1 | 9.5 | 82% | ▼ 1 |
| 40 | 1 | 9.7 | 78% | ▼ 1 |
| 41 | <1 | 8.9 | 59% | ▲ 9 |
| 42 | <1 | 9.7 | 63% | ▲ 14 |
| 43 | <1 | 6.4 | 99% | ▼ 9 |
| 44 | <1 | 8.3 | 90% | ▼ 2 |
| 45 | <1 | 10.7 | 80% | ▲ 4 |
| 46 | <1 | 7.7 | 90% | ▼ 9 |
| 47 | <1 | 6.4 | 75% | ▼ 1 |
| 48 | <1 | 9.5 | 86% | ▼ 8 |
| 49 | <1 | 17.0 | 97% | ▲ 3 |
| 50 | <1 | 10.1 | 87% | ▼ 9 |
| 51 | <1 | 9.3 | 79% | ▼ 4 |
| 52 | <1 | 9.7 | 87% | ▼ 4 |
| 53 | <1 | 11.2 | 84% | ▼ 8 |
| 54 | <1 | 5.4 | 82% | ▼ 1 |
| 55 | <1 | 6.1 | 70% | ▼ 1 |
Superflex PPR wide receiver rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68 | 25.8 | 100% | – |
| 2 | 68 | 24.8 | 100% | – |
| 3 | 64 | 20.0 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 57 | 22.4 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 5 | 55 | 19.7 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 47 | 20.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 41 | 17.7 | 100% | – |
| 8 | 37 | 15.3 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 9 | 37 | 16.2 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 10 | 37 | 19.7 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 11 | 36 | 15.9 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 30 | 15.6 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 13 | 29 | 13.6 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 14 | 29 | 14.8 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 15 | 28 | 17.3 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 16 | 26 | 18.2 | 100% | ▲ 4 |
| 17 | 26 | 15.1 | 100% | ▲ 6 |
| 18 | 25 | 13.5 | 100% | ▼ 3 |
| 19 | 25 | 13.7 | 100% | ▼ 3 |
| 20 | 24 | 11.0 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 21 | 23 | 14.2 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 22 | 21 | 13.0 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | 16 | 13.2 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
Tier 7
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 13 | 8.6 | 99% | ▲ 1 |
| 25 | 11 | 11.0 | 77% | ▲ 7 |
| 26 | 11 | 11.1 | 100% | – |
| 27 | 10 | 12.3 | 100% | ▼ 3 |
| 28 | 8 | 9.9 | 100% | ▲ 3 |
| 29 | 8 | 9.1 | 99% | ▲ 1 |
| 30 | 8 | 12.9 | 99% | ▼ 2 |
| 31 | 7 | 13.4 | 99% | ▼ 4 |
| 32 | 6 | 9.9 | 98% | ▲ 4 |
| 33 | 4 | 4.2 | 60% | ▲ 2 |
| 34 | 4 | 12.1 | 93% | ▼ 5 |
| 35 | 3 | 12.1 | 94% | ▼ 2 |
| 36 | 2 | 9.7 | 78% | ▲ 5 |
| 37 | 2 | 9.5 | 84% | ▲ 7 |
| 38 | 1 | 8.3 | 85% | ▲ 7 |
| 39 | 1 | 9.5 | 23% | – |
| 40 | 1 | 9.7 | 98% | ▲ 3 |
| 41 | 1 | 9.5 | 86% | ▼ 1 |
| 42 | 1 | 9.5 | 82% | ▼ 4 |
| 43 | 1 | 6.5 | 36% | ▼ 6 |
| 44 | <1 | 9.7 | 87% | ▲ 12 |
| 45 | <1 | 5.4 | 82% | ▲ 12 |
| 46 | <1 | 8.9 | 59% | ▲ 3 |
| 47 | <1 | 8.3 | 90% | ▼ 8 |
| 48 | <1 | 10.7 | 80% | ▲ 5 |
| 49 | <1 | 7.7 | 90% | ▼ 2 |
| 50 | <1 | 7.1 | 68% | ▲ 1 |
| 51 | <1 | 6.4 | 99% | ▼ 17 |
| 52 | <1 | 9.7 | 63% | ▼ 2 |
| 53 | <1 | 6.4 | 75% | ▲ 1 |
| 54 | <1 | 6.1 | 70% | ▲ 1 |
| 55 | <1 | 17.0 | 97% | ▼ 3 |
| 56 | <1 | 10.1 | 87% | ▼ 14 |
| 57 | <1 | 11.2 | 84% | ▲ 1 |
| 58 | <1 | 9.3 | 79% | ▼ 10 |
Value: the points a week a player adds over the best waiver pickup at his position for the rest of the season, the median across real redraft leagues' own Trade Values charts, with the top player at 100. Tiers break where value drops by a tenth. Change: his move at his position since week 9. Rostered: the share of leagues with him on a roster in the latest finished week.
Common questions
Who is the WR1 rest of season?
In week 10 PPR leagues, Puka Nacua, then Jaxon Smith-Njigba and Ja'Marr Chase.
How are these rankings made?
From the median of real leagues' own Trade Values charts: the points a week each player adds over the best waiver pickup at his position for the rest of the season. Tiers break where value drops by a tenth.