WeekWeek 10
ScoringPPRHalf PPRStandardSuperflex PPR
Every running back ranked for the rest of the 2026 season by real leagues' own Trade Values charts, as of week 10, in tiers. Jahmyr Gibbs, Kenneth Walker III, and Christian McCaffrey lead PPR leagues.
By position: Quarterbacks Running backs Wide receivers Tight ends
PPR running back rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 26.2 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 80 | 24.5 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 3 | 75 | 20.8 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 65 | 20.0 | 100% | – |
| 5 | 59 | 18.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 49 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 7 | 47 | 17.7 | 100% | ▲ 9 |
| 8 | 45 | 17.1 | 100% | ▲ 3 |
| 9 | 44 | 17.7 | 100% | ▲ 3 |
| 10 | 43 | 15.8 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 11 | 40 | 18.3 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 12 | 40 | 17.6 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 13 | 39 | 17.7 | 100% | ▼ 6 |
| 14 | 38 | 15.5 | 100% | ▼ 4 |
| 15 | 37 | 15.9 | 100% | – |
| 16 | 37 | 12.7 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 28 | 14.6 | 100% | – |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 23 | 13.6 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 19 | 23 | 10.1 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 20 | 21 | 8.4 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 21 | 19 | 8.5 | 98% | – |
| 22 | 18 | 11.5 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 23 | 17 | 12.6 | 100% | – |
| 24 | 17 | 9.1 | 94% | – |
| 25 | 17 | 14.8 | 94% | – |
Tier 7
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 10 | 14.6 | 100% | – |
| 27 | 8 | 10.4 | 97% | – |
| 28 | 6 | 12.6 | 78% | ▲ 22 |
| 29 | 6 | 10.5 | 98% | ▲ 3 |
| 30 | 6 | 11.7 | 99% | – |
| 31 | 5 | 8.9 | 90% | ▼ 2 |
| 32 | 5 | 10.0 | 97% | ▼ 4 |
| 33 | 4 | 6.5 | 40% | ▲ 2 |
| 34 | 4 | 10.0 | 100% | ▼ 3 |
| 35 | 3 | 10.1 | 99% | ▲ 5 |
| 36 | 3 | 6.9 | 88% | ▼ 3 |
| 37 | 3 | 10.3 | 97% | – |
| 38 | 2 | 5.6 | 78% | ▲ 6 |
| 39 | 2 | 6.3 | 74% | ▼ 3 |
| 40 | 2 | 7.1 | 73% | ▼ 2 |
| 41 | 2 | 6.7 | 92% | ▼ 7 |
| 42 | 1 | 8.2 | 39% | ▲ 5 |
| 43 | 1 | 8.9 | 98% | ▼ 2 |
| 44 | 1 | 3.6 | 19% | – |
| 45 | 1 | 3.1 | 28% | ▲ 9 |
| 46 | <1 | 3.6 | 63% | ▲ 2 |
| 47 | <1 | 4.7 | 64% | ▲ 2 |
| 48 | <1 | 7.6 | 60% | ▲ 3 |
| 49 | <1 | 4.2 | 65% | ▲ 3 |
| 50 | <1 | 6.6 | 30% | ▲ 3 |
| 51 | <1 | 8.9 | 76% | ▼ 8 |
| 52 | <1 | 10.0 | 18% | ▲ 3 |
| 53 | <1 | 9.0 | 74% | ▲ 3 |
| 54 | <1 | 7.9 | 66% | ▲ 4 |
| 55 | <1 | 4.1 | 13% | ▲ 4 |
| 56 | <1 | 8.8 | 49% | ▲ 4 |
| 57 | <1 | – | 26% | ▲ 4 |
| 58 | <1 | 3.4 | 18% | ▲ 4 |
| 59 | <1 | 4.6 | 29% | ▲ 4 |
| 60 | <1 | 5.5 | 42% | ▲ 4 |
| 61 | <1 | 0.7 | 17% | – |
| 62 | <1 | 4.3 | 28% | ▲ 3 |
| 63 | <1 | 4.7 | 51% | ▲ 3 |
| 64 | <1 | 11.3 | 24% | – |
| 65 | <1 | 1.4 | 15% | ▲ 3 |
| 66 | <1 | 4.5 | 37% | ▲ 1 |
| 67 | <1 | 6.3 | 36% | ▲ 2 |
| 68 | <1 | 7.8 | 97% | ▼ 29 |
| 69 | <1 | 6.4 | 37% | ▲ 2 |
| 70 | <1 | 9.3 | 41% | – |
Half PPR running back rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 26.2 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 83 | 24.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 73 | 20.8 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 65 | 20.0 | 100% | – |
| 5 | 64 | 18.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 51 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 7 | 50 | 17.7 | 100% | ▲ 8 |
| 8 | 48 | 15.8 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 9 | 48 | 17.1 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 10 | 46 | 17.7 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 11 | 42 | 18.3 | 100% | ▼ 3 |
| 12 | 41 | 17.6 | 100% | – |
| 13 | 40 | 17.7 | 100% | ▼ 4 |
| 14 | 40 | 15.9 | 100% | – |
| 15 | 37 | 15.5 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 16 | 34 | 12.7 | 100% | – |
| 17 | 32 | 14.6 | 100% | – |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 25 | 10.1 | 100% | – |
| 19 | 25 | 8.4 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 20 | 24 | 13.6 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 21 | 22 | 9.1 | 94% | ▲ 2 |
| 22 | 21 | 8.5 | 98% | ▼ 2 |
| 23 | 21 | 14.8 | 94% | ▲ 1 |
| 24 | 20 | 11.5 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 25 | 19 | 12.6 | 100% | – |
Tier 7
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 11 | 10.5 | 98% | ▲ 4 |
| 27 | 11 | 14.6 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 28 | 9 | 10.4 | 97% | ▼ 1 |
Tier 8
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 6 | 12.6 | 78% | ▲ 21 |
| 30 | 6 | 11.7 | 99% | ▲ 2 |
| 31 | 6 | 8.9 | 90% | ▼ 2 |
| 32 | 6 | 6.5 | 40% | ▲ 2 |
| 33 | 6 | 6.9 | 88% | – |
| 34 | 5 | 10.0 | 97% | ▼ 6 |
| 35 | 5 | 6.7 | 92% | ▼ 4 |
| 36 | 4 | 6.3 | 74% | – |
| 37 | 4 | 10.0 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 38 | 3 | 10.1 | 99% | ▲ 1 |
| 39 | 3 | 5.6 | 78% | ▲ 1 |
| 40 | 3 | 10.3 | 97% | ▼ 3 |
| 41 | 2 | 8.9 | 98% | ▲ 1 |
| 42 | 2 | 6.8 | 64% | ▲ 1 |
| 43 | 1 | 8.2 | 39% | ▲ 4 |
| 44 | 1 | 7.1 | 73% | ▲ 2 |
| 45 | 1 | 9.3 | 41% | ▼ 4 |
| 46 | 1 | 3.6 | 19% | – |
| 47 | 1 | 9.0 | 74% | ▲ 13 |
| 48 | 1 | 3.1 | 28% | ▲ 5 |
| 49 | <1 | 8.9 | 76% | ▼ 5 |
| 50 | <1 | 4.2 | 65% | ▲ 8 |
| 51 | <1 | 7.6 | 60% | ▲ 6 |
| 52 | <1 | 4.7 | 64% | ▲ 4 |
| 53 | <1 | 3.6 | 63% | ▲ 2 |
| 54 | <1 | 10.5 | 91% | ▼ 6 |
| 55 | <1 | – | 22% | ▼ 4 |
| 56 | <1 | 5.6 | 36% | ▲ 20 |
| 57 | <1 | 4.2 | 22% | ▼ 8 |
| 58 | <1 | 3.4 | 18% | ▲ 13 |
| 59 | <1 | 3.5 | 20% | ▲ 5 |
| 60 | <1 | 5.5 | 42% | ▲ 8 |
| 61 | <1 | 6.8 | 25% | ▲ 14 |
| 62 | <1 | 6.5 | 12% | – |
| 63 | <1 | 7.9 | 90% | ▼ 18 |
| 64 | <1 | 1.4 | 15% | – |
| 65 | <1 | 11.3 | 24% | – |
| 66 | <1 | 4.7 | 51% | ▼ 4 |
| 67 | <1 | 11.2 | 83% | ▼ 2 |
| 68 | <1 | 6.6 | 30% | ▼ 16 |
| 69 | <1 | 4.6 | 29% | – |
| 70 | <1 | 7.9 | 66% | ▲ 2 |
Standard running back rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 26.2 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 86 | 24.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 72 | 18.5 | 100% | – |
| 4 | 69 | 20.8 | 100% | – |
| 5 | 66 | 20.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 54 | 17.7 | 100% | ▲ 8 |
| 7 | 53 | 15.8 | 100% | – |
| 8 | 53 | 17.1 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 9 | 50 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 10 | 49 | 17.7 | 100% | – |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 43 | 18.3 | 100% | ▼ 3 |
| 12 | 43 | 15.9 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 13 | 42 | 17.6 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 14 | 40 | 17.7 | 100% | ▼ 3 |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 34 | 14.6 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 16 | 32 | 15.5 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
Tier 7
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 27 | 8.4 | 100% | ▲ 3 |
| 18 | 26 | 12.7 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 19 | 26 | 10.1 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 20 | 24 | 13.6 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
| 21 | 24 | 14.8 | 94% | – |
| 22 | 22 | 9.1 | 94% | ▲ 1 |
| 23 | 21 | 8.5 | 98% | ▼ 1 |
| 24 | 19 | 12.6 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 25 | 19 | 11.5 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
Tier 8
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 13 | 10.5 | 98% | ▲ 3 |
| 27 | 12 | 14.6 | 100% | ▼ 1 |
Tier 9
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 9 | 11.7 | 99% | ▲ 2 |
| 29 | 9 | 10.4 | 97% | ▼ 2 |
| 30 | 8 | 6.7 | 92% | ▼ 2 |
| 31 | 7 | 6.5 | 40% | ▲ 4 |
| 32 | 6 | 10.0 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 33 | 6 | 6.9 | 88% | – |
| 34 | 5 | 8.9 | 90% | ▼ 2 |
| 35 | 4 | 6.8 | 64% | ▲ 2 |
| 36 | 3 | 5.6 | 78% | ▲ 5 |
| 37 | 3 | 10.3 | 97% | ▼ 1 |
| 38 | 3 | 10.0 | 97% | ▼ 7 |
| 39 | 3 | 10.1 | 99% | ▼ 1 |
| 40 | 2 | 8.9 | 98% | – |
| 41 | 2 | 9.3 | 41% | ▲ 4 |
| 42 | 1 | 5.5 | 42% | – |
| 43 | 1 | 9.0 | 74% | ▲ 11 |
| 44 | 1 | 3.1 | 28% | – |
| 45 | <1 | 7.1 | 73% | ▼ 1 |
| 46 | <1 | 7.9 | 90% | ▼ 3 |
| 47 | <1 | 5.6 | 36% | ▼ 1 |
| 48 | <1 | 7.8 | 97% | ▼ 9 |
| 49 | <1 | 10.5 | 91% | ▼ 2 |
| 50 | <1 | 7.9 | 66% | ▼ 1 |
| 51 | <1 | 11.2 | 83% | ▼ 3 |
| 52 | <1 | 8.8 | 49% | ▼ 2 |
Superflex PPR running back rankings
Tier 1
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 26.2 | 100% | – |
Tier 2
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 80 | 24.5 | 100% | – |
| 3 | 73 | 20.8 | 100% | – |
| 4 | 66 | 20.0 | 100% | – |
Tier 3
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 58 | 18.5 | 100% | – |
Tier 4
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 47 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 7 | 45 | 17.7 | 100% | ▲ 8 |
| 8 | 43 | 17.7 | 100% | ▲ 5 |
| 9 | 42 | 17.1 | 100% | – |
| 10 | 41 | 15.8 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 11 | 40 | 17.6 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 12 | 39 | 18.3 | 100% | ▼ 4 |
| 13 | 37 | 17.7 | 100% | ▼ 6 |
| 14 | 37 | 15.5 | 100% | ▼ 4 |
| 15 | 35 | 15.9 | 100% | ▲ 1 |
| 16 | 35 | 12.7 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
Tier 5
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 28 | 14.6 | 100% | – |
Tier 6
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 22 | 13.6 | 100% | – |
| 19 | 21 | 10.1 | 100% | – |
| 20 | 19 | 8.4 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 21 | 17 | 8.5 | 98% | ▲ 2 |
| 22 | 16 | 11.5 | 100% | ▼ 2 |
| 23 | 16 | 9.1 | 94% | ▲ 2 |
| 24 | 16 | 12.6 | 100% | ▼ 3 |
| 25 | 15 | 14.8 | 94% | ▼ 1 |
Tier 7
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 7 | 14.6 | 100% | – |
| 27 | 7 | 10.4 | 97% | – |
Tier 8
| Player | Value | Points a week | Rostered | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 4 | 8.9 | 90% | ▲ 1 |
| 29 | 4 | 10.0 | 100% | ▲ 2 |
| 30 | 4 | 11.7 | 99% | – |
| 31 | 3 | 10.5 | 98% | ▲ 2 |
| 32 | 3 | 10.1 | 99% | ▲ 12 |
| 33 | 3 | 6.5 | 40% | ▲ 2 |
| 34 | 3 | 10.0 | 97% | ▼ 6 |
| 35 | 3 | 10.3 | 97% | ▼ 1 |
| 36 | 2 | 5.6 | 78% | ▲ 16 |
| 37 | 2 | 6.9 | 88% | ▲ 3 |
| 38 | 1 | 8.9 | 98% | ▲ 5 |
| 39 | 1 | 7.1 | 73% | ▲ 2 |
| 40 | 1 | 3.1 | 28% | – |
| 41 | <1 | 6.7 | 92% | ▼ 4 |
| 42 | <1 | 7.9 | 90% | ▼ 3 |
| 43 | <1 | 7.8 | 97% | ▼ 7 |
| 44 | <1 | 10.5 | 91% | ▲ 2 |
| 45 | <1 | 5.5 | 42% | – |
| 46 | <1 | 6.8 | 64% | ▲ 3 |
| 47 | <1 | 11.2 | 83% | ▲ 3 |
| 48 | <1 | 7.9 | 66% | ▲ 5 |
| 49 | <1 | 4.7 | 51% | ▼ 1 |
| 50 | <1 | 9.0 | 74% | ▲ 1 |
Value: the points a week a player adds over the best waiver pickup at his position for the rest of the season, the median across real redraft leagues' own Trade Values charts, with the top player at 100. Tiers break where value drops by a tenth. Change: his move at his position since week 9. Rostered: the share of leagues with him on a roster in the latest finished week.
Common questions
Who is the RB1 rest of season?
In week 10 PPR leagues, Jahmyr Gibbs, then Kenneth Walker III and Christian McCaffrey.
How are these rankings made?
From the median of real leagues' own Trade Values charts: the points a week each player adds over the best waiver pickup at his position for the rest of the season. Tiers break where value drops by a tenth.