IN YOUR LEAGUE
Jerious Norwood in your league
Who drafted Jerious Norwood in your league, and did it win them a title?
Connect your league to see every season he spent in it: what he cost, who started him, and the titles he won.
Connect your leagueYahoo · Sleeper · ESPN · CBS · MFL · Fleaflicker · Fantrax
THE STATS
Jerious Norwood stats by season
Jerious Norwood's NFL stats and fantasy points every regular season, with his finish among RBs by total points. Pick a scoring format to switch the points.
| Rushing | Receiving | Other | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | GP | Points | Per game | Finish | Att | Yds | Y/A | TD | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % |
| 2011 | 7 | 4.14.14.1 | 0.60.60.6 | RB127RB125RB120 | 24 | 61 | 2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 1 | 2.72.21.7 | 2.72.21.7 | RB135RB134RB133 | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 10 | 66.857.347.8 | 6.75.74.8 | RB63RB63RB68 | 76 | 252 | 3.3 | 0 | 22 | 19 | 186 | 1 | 1 | – |
| 2008 | 16 | 152.7134.7116.7 | 9.58.47.3 | RB35RB36RB37 | 94 | 489 | 5.2 | 4 | – | 36 | 338 | 2 | 1 | – |
| 2007 | 15 | 123.2109.295.2 | 8.27.36.3 | RB41RB42RB42 | 102 | 615 | 6.0 | 1 | – | 28 | 277 | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 14 | 98.592.085.5 | 7.06.66.1 | RB46RB45RB43 | 99 | 633 | 6.4 | 2 | – | 13 | 102 | 0 | 0 | – |
| Career | 63 | 448.0399.5351.0 | 7.16.35.6 | 397 | 2,058 | 5.2 | 7 | – | 97 | 912 | 3 | 2 | – | |
Regular season only. Finish is his rank among RBs by total points that season. Stats from the NFL's official box scores.
THE GAME LOG
Jerious Norwood game log
Every week: his stat line and fantasy points, his finish among RBs that week, and what real leagues did with him: the share that rostered him, how often managers started him, and how often their team won when they did.
Points by week
Hover or tap a bar for his line. Follows the scoring toggle.
2011 game log
| Rushing | Receiving | Other | In real leagues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Att | Yds | Y/A | TD | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 1.01.01.0 | ––– | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| 2 | 0.80.80.8 | ––– | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 2% | 39% | – |
| 3 | Did not play | 3% | 20% | – | |||||||||||
| 12 | 2.22.22.2 | ––– | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| 13 | 1.91.91.9 | ––– | 11 | 19 | 1.7 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| 14 | 0.30.30.3 | ––– | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| 15 | -0.1-0.1-0.1 | ––– | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| 17 | -2.0-2.0-2.0 | ––– | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| Total | 4.14.14.1 | 24 | 61 | 2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | ||||
2010 game log
| Rushing | Receiving | Other | In real leagues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Att | Yds | Y/A | TD | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 2.72.21.7 | ––– | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | – | 9% | 0% | – |
| 2 | Did not play | 8% | 1% | – | |||||||||||
| 3 | Did not play | 2% | 0% | – | |||||||||||
| Total | 2.72.21.7 | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | – | ||||
2009 game log
| Rushing | Receiving | Other | In real leagues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Att | Yds | Y/A | TD | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 10.68.15.6 | ––– | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 49 | 0 | 0 | – | 55% | 8% | 46% |
| 2 | 0.60.60.6 | ––– | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 49% | 8% | 35% |
| 3 | Did not play | 38% | 2% | – | |||||||||||
| 4 | Did not play | 28% | 0% | – | |||||||||||
| 5 | 2.82.31.8 | ––– | 12 | 44 | 3.7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -6 | 0 | 1 | – | 24% | 10% | 23% |
| 6 | 5.34.33.3 | ––– | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | – | 21% | 9% | – |
| 7 | Did not play | 16% | 3% | – | |||||||||||
| 8 | Did not play | 13% | 3% | – | |||||||||||
| 9 | Did not play | 10% | 3% | – | |||||||||||
| 10 | Did not play | 14% | 2% | – | |||||||||||
| 11 | Did not play | 29% | 3% | – | |||||||||||
| 12 | 13.012.011.0 | ––– | 6 | 22 | 3.7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 1 | 0 | – | 28% | 2% | – |
| 13 | 6.25.24.2 | ––– | 11 | 18 | 1.6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 0 | – | 55% | 47% | 44% |
| 14 | 3.33.33.3 | ––– | 9 | 33 | 3.7 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 28% | 17% | 48% |
| 15 | 8.97.96.9 | ––– | 9 | 22 | 2.4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 47 | 0 | 0 | – | 21% | 7% | – |
| 16 | 7.16.66.1 | ––– | 13 | 52 | 4.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | – | 21% | 22% | 37% |
| 17 | 9.07.05.0 | ––– | 9 | 27 | 3.0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 0 | – | 22% | 32% | – |
| Total | 66.857.347.8 | 76 | 252 | 3.3 | 0 | 22 | 19 | 186 | 1 | 1 | – | ||||
2008 game log
| Rushing | Receiving | Other | In real leagues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Att | Yds | Y/A | TD | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 17.916.915.9 | ––– | 14 | 93 | 6.6 | 1 | – | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | – | 59% | 11% | 59% |
| 2 | 3.63.12.6 | ––– | 6 | 18 | 3.0 | 0 | – | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | – | 74% | 26% | 44% |
| 3 | 11.511.010.5 | ––– | 11 | 75 | 6.8 | 0 | – | 1 | 30 | 0 | 0 | – | 74% | 31% | 44% |
| 4 | 9.27.25.2 | ––– | 3 | 51 | 17.0 | 0 | – | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | 74% | 31% | 47% |
| 5 | 5.13.62.1 | ––– | 4 | 12 | 3.0 | 0 | – | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | – | 72% | 32% | 48% |
| 6 | 2.72.21.7 | ––– | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 0 | – | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | – | 65% | 27% | 41% |
| 7 | Did not play | 57% | 2% | – | |||||||||||
| 8 | 11.08.56.0 | ––– | 4 | 5 | 1.3 | 0 | – | 5 | 55 | 0 | 0 | – | 52% | 25% | 41% |
| 9 | 16.315.314.3 | ––– | 13 | 63 | 4.8 | 1 | – | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | – | 53% | 36% | 52% |
| 10 | 18.517.516.5 | ––– | 6 | 17 | 2.8 | 0 | – | 2 | 88 | 1 | 0 | – | 62% | 54% | 56% |
| 11 | 7.35.84.3 | ––– | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 0 | – | 3 | 25 | 0 | 0 | – | 73% | 50% | 34% |
| 12 | 2.62.11.6 | ––– | 4 | 11 | 2.8 | 0 | – | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | – | 70% | 29% | 40% |
| 13 | 4.63.62.6 | ––– | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 0 | – | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | – | 66% | 20% | 38% |
| 14 | 7.85.83.8 | ––– | 5 | 18 | 3.6 | 0 | – | 4 | 20 | 0 | 0 | – | 43% | 23% | 38% |
| 15 | 3.72.71.7 | ––– | 4 | -7 | -1.8 | 0 | – | 2 | 24 | 0 | 0 | – | 35% | 17% | 30% |
| 16 | 10.19.18.1 | ––– | 6 | 10 | 1.7 | 0 | – | 2 | 11 | 1 | 0 | – | 30% | 17% | 49% |
| 17 | 20.820.319.8 | ––– | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 2 | – | 1 | 22 | 0 | 0 | – | 46% | 42% | 70% |
| Total | 152.7134.7116.7 | 94 | 489 | 5.2 | 4 | – | 36 | 338 | 2 | 1 | – | ||||
2007 game log
| Rushing | Receiving | Other | In real leagues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Att | Yds | Y/A | TD | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 7.76.75.7 | ––– | 5 | 33 | 6.6 | 0 | – | 2 | 24 | 0 | 0 | – | 92% | 20% | 43% |
| 2 | 5.34.84.3 | ––– | 9 | 30 | 3.3 | 0 | – | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | – | 90% | 23% | 48% |
| 3 | 9.68.16.6 | ––– | 6 | 32 | 5.3 | 0 | – | 3 | 34 | 0 | 0 | – | 86% | 14% | 31% |
| 4 | 6.55.54.5 | ––– | 9 | 29 | 3.2 | 0 | – | 2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | – | 80% | 34% | 40% |
| 5 | 4.73.72.7 | ––– | 6 | 23 | 3.8 | 0 | – | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | – | 74% | 29% | 48% |
| 6 | 23.821.819.8 | ––– | 6 | 87 | 14.5 | 1 | – | 4 | 51 | 0 | 0 | – | 70% | 38% | 58% |
| 7 | 6.95.43.9 | ––– | 6 | 38 | 6.3 | 0 | – | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | 82% | 56% | 41% |
| 8 | Did not play | 76% | 4% | – | |||||||||||
| 9 | 3.93.93.9 | ––– | 6 | 39 | 6.5 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 81% | 47% | 37% |
| 10 | Did not play | 71% | 17% | 26% | |||||||||||
| 11 | 3.42.41.4 | ––– | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 | – | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | – | 69% | 15% | 38% |
| 12 | 5.24.74.2 | ––– | 6 | 33 | 5.5 | 0 | – | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | – | 65% | 17% | 46% |
| 13 | 14.513.011.5 | ––– | 8 | 94 | 11.8 | 0 | – | 3 | 21 | 0 | 0 | – | 65% | 23% | 43% |
| 14 | 9.88.87.8 | ––– | 6 | 21 | 3.5 | 0 | – | 2 | 57 | 0 | 0 | – | 50% | 35% | 42% |
| 15 | 7.37.37.3 | ––– | 9 | 73 | 8.1 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 42% | 21% | 49% |
| 16 | 3.93.42.9 | ––– | 7 | 33 | 4.7 | 0 | – | 1 | -4 | 0 | 0 | – | 36% | 27% | 51% |
| 17 | 10.79.78.7 | ––– | 11 | 46 | 4.2 | 0 | – | 2 | 41 | 0 | 0 | – | 34% | 40% | – |
| Total | 123.2109.295.2 | 102 | 615 | 6.0 | 1 | – | 28 | 277 | 0 | 0 | – | ||||
2006 game log
| Rushing | Receiving | Other | In real leagues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Att | Yds | Y/A | TD | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 6.66.66.6 | ––– | 10 | 66 | 6.6 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 45% | 2% | – |
| 2 | 6.76.25.7 | ––– | 9 | 45 | 5.0 | 0 | – | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | – | 50% | 4% | – |
| 3 | 0.00.00.0 | ––– | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 49% | 19% | 39% |
| 4 | 16.616.616.6 | ––– | 6 | 106 | 17.7 | 1 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 46% | 12% | 50% |
| 5 | Did not play | 53% | 0% | – | |||||||||||
| 6 | 2.11.61.1 | ––– | 4 | 9 | 2.3 | 0 | – | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | – | 52% | 18% | 26% |
| 7 | 7.97.46.9 | ––– | 8 | 64 | 8.0 | 0 | – | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | – | 48% | 14% | 33% |
| 8 | 10.08.57.0 | ––– | 9 | 31 | 3.4 | 0 | – | 3 | 39 | 0 | 0 | – | 50% | 17% | 44% |
| 9 | 4.94.43.9 | ––– | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 0 | – | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | – | 53% | 27% | 29% |
| 10 | Did not play | 48% | 5% | – | |||||||||||
| 11 | 0.20.20.2 | ––– | 3 | 2 | 0.7 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 44% | 3% | – |
| 12 | 8.17.16.1 | ––– | 13 | 54 | 4.2 | 0 | – | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | – | 41% | 4% | – |
| 13 | 16.716.716.7 | ––– | 9 | 107 | 11.9 | 1 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 45% | 6% | – |
| 14 | 4.64.13.6 | ––– | 7 | 32 | 4.6 | 0 | – | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | – | 38% | 13% | 43% |
| 15 | Did not play | 31% | 4% | – | |||||||||||
| 16 | 2.02.02.0 | ––– | 5 | 20 | 4.0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 26% | 6% | – |
| 17 | 12.110.69.1 | ––– | 10 | 63 | 6.3 | 0 | – | 3 | 28 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| Total | 98.592.085.5 | 99 | 633 | 6.4 | 2 | – | 13 | 102 | 0 | 0 | – | ||||
ROSTER %
How real leagues use Jerious Norwood
Rostered and started, week by week
Share of real leagues.
| Season | Rostered | Started | Team won when he started |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 3% | 28% | 27% |
| 2010 | 6% | 0% | – |
| 2009 | 29% | 12% | 41% |
| 2008 | 64% | 29% | 44% |
| 2007 | 75% | 26% | 42% |
| 2006 | 47% | 11% | 36% |
Average week, weeks 1 to 14.
THE DRAFT
Where Jerious Norwood goes in real drafts
Where Jerious Norwood actually went in real redraft leagues each season, not mock drafts. Picks are 12-team equivalents (round.pick) so every league size lines up.
ADP by season
12-team equivalent pick in real redraft leagues. Higher is earlier.
ADP by site
| Season | All sites | Drafted in | Yahoo | ESPN | MyFantasyLeague |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2010 | 15.04 | 9% | 15.09 | 14.08 | – |
| 2009 | 13.03 | 54% | 13.05 | 12.11 | 12.04 |
| 2008 | 13.02 | 56% | 13.07 | 11.07 | 12.10 |
| 2007 | 8.11 | 88% | 9.01 | 8.01 | – |
| 2006 | 13.03 | 26% | 13.04 | – | – |
ADP by scoring format
| Season | PPR | Half PPR | Standard | Standard superflex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | – | – | – | – |
| 2010 | – | – | 14.11 | – |
| 2009 | 13.03 | 12.08 | 13.02 | – |
| 2008 | 12.08 | 13.01 | 13.03 | – |
| 2007 | 8.11 | 8.04 | 8.08 | 10.04 |
| 2006 | – | – | 13.01 | – |
Average pick by league size
| Season | 8 teams | 10 teams | 12 teams | 14 teams |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | – | – | – | – |
| 2010 | – | 144.8 | 174.9 | – |
| 2009 | – | 134.1 | 141.1 | 154.2 |
| 2008 | – | 136.5 | 136.2 | 149.6 |
| 2007 | 92.8 | 83.8 | 80.2 | 78 |
| 2006 | – | 129 | 144.8 | – |
The overall pick he went at in leagues of each size, not converted to 12 teams.
THE PAYOFF
Did drafting Jerious Norwood pay off?
How the teams that drafted Jerious Norwood finished, every season. In 2010 they won 12.6% of league titles, against 8.5% for a random team in the same leagues, and made the playoffs 49% of the time.
Title rate vs. a random team
Teams that drafted him, each finished season.
| Season | Won the title | Made playoffs | Team win % | Of champions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | – | – | – | 0% |
| 2010 | 13% | 49% | 50% | 0% |
| 2009 | 9% | 52% | 50% | 3% |
| 2008 | 7% | 50% | 50% | 5% |
| 2007 | 10% | 51% | 49% | 7% |
| 2006 | 10% | 50% | 49% | 5% |
The gold tick on each bar is the title rate for any team in those leagues (one in the league's size). "Of champions" is the share of league champions with him on their roster in the title week.
Title rate by scoring format
| Season | PPR | Half PPR | Standard | Standard superflex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | – | – | – | – |
| 2010 | – | – | 11.1% | – |
| 2009 | 12.3% | 4.2% | 8.7% | – |
| 2008 | 7.8% | 6.5% | 6.5% | – |
| 2007 | 14.7% | 11.9% | 6.7% | 12.0% |
| 2006 | – | – | 10.8% | – |
Green beat the one-in-league-size baseline by 15% or more, amber trailed it.
THE WIRE
Trades and waivers
The share of leagues where Jerious Norwood was traded, picked up or dropped at some point in the season. No league traded him in 2011.
| Season | Traded in | Busiest trade week | Added in | Dropped in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0% | – | 5% | 5% |
| 2010 | under 1% | Week 1 | 4% | 12% |
| 2009 | 3% | Week 1 | 58% | 64% |
| 2008 | 7% | Week 7 | 56% | 54% |
| 2007 | 12% | Week 6 | 45% | 56% |
| 2006 | 5% | Week 6 | 60% | 46% |
Out of every league that season. A league counts once however many times he moved, and preseason moves count.
Common questions
Did teams that drafted Jerious Norwood win their league?
In 2010, 12.6% of teams that drafted him won the title, against 8.5% for any team in the same leagues. 0% of league champions had him on their roster in the title week.
What percentage of leagues roster Jerious Norwood?
He was rostered in 3% of leagues in an average week of 2011 (weeks 1–14), and managers started him 28% of the time.
How often is Jerious Norwood traded in fantasy?
No league traded him in 2011.
Where do these numbers come from?
From real fantasy leagues connected to Fantasy Hall of Fame from Yahoo, Sleeper, ESPN, CBS, MFL, Fleaflicker and Fantrax: their drafts, weekly lineups, transactions and final standings. Every number covers at least 20 leagues; no league or manager is identified.