IN YOUR LEAGUE
Isaac Bruce in your league
Who drafted Isaac Bruce in your league, and did it win them a title?
Connect your league to see every season he spent in it: what he cost, who started him, and the titles he won.
Connect your leagueYahoo · Sleeper · ESPN · CBS · MFL · Fleaflicker · Fantrax
THE STATS
Isaac Bruce stats by season
Isaac Bruce's NFL stats and fantasy points every regular season, with his finish among WRs by total points. Pick a scoring format to switch the points.
| Receiving | Other | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | GP | Points | Per game | Finish | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % |
| 2009 | 8 | 46.636.125.6 | 5.84.53.2 | WR105WR105WR106 | 45 | 21 | 264 | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 15 | 185.0155.0125.0 | 12.310.38.3 | WR29WR27WR25 | – | 60 | 833 | 7 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 13 | 151.9124.496.9 | 11.79.67.5 | WR42WR42WR41 | – | 55 | 733 | 4 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 16 | 203.8166.8129.8 | 12.710.48.1 | WR23WR23WR25 | – | 74 | 1,098 | 3 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 11 | 106.588.570.5 | 9.78.06.4 | WR61WR59WR56 | – | 36 | 525 | 3 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 16 | 246.2201.7157.2 | 15.412.69.8 | WR13WR14WR18 | – | 89 | 1,292 | 6 | 4 | – |
| Career | 79 | 940.0772.5605.0 | 11.99.87.7 | – | 335 | 4,745 | 23 | 4 | – | |
Regular season only. Finish is his rank among WRs by total points that season. Stats from the NFL's official box scores.
THE GAME LOG
Isaac Bruce game log
Every week: his stat line and fantasy points, his finish among WRs that week, and what real leagues did with him: the share that rostered him, how often managers started him, and how often their team won when they did.
Points by week
Hover or tap a bar for his line. Follows the scoring toggle.
2009 game log
| Receiving | Other | In real leagues | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 10.68.66.6 | ––– | 8 | 4 | 74 | 0 | 0 | – | 50% | 27% | 50% |
| 2 | 7.55.53.5 | ––– | 8 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 0 | – | 51% | 31% | 43% |
| 3 | 5.84.83.8 | ––– | 5 | 2 | 38 | 0 | 0 | – | 45% | 26% | 39% |
| 4 | 5.03.52.0 | ––– | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 0 | – | 37% | 46% | 33% |
| 5 | Did not play | 27% | 36% | 35% | |||||||
| 6 | Did not play | 17% | 1% | – | |||||||
| 7 | 4.33.32.3 | ––– | 6 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 0 | – | 15% | 23% | 48% |
| 8 | 9.17.15.1 | ––– | 8 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 0 | – | 11% | 28% | 36% |
| 9 | 1.30.80.3 | ––– | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | – | 11% | 39% | 38% |
| 10 | Did not play | 9% | 19% | – | |||||||
| 11 | 3.02.52.0 | ––– | 4 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | – | 8% | 7% | – |
| 12 | Did not play | 7% | 8% | – | |||||||
| 13 | Did not play | 7% | 5% | – | |||||||
| 14 | Did not play | 4% | 3% | – | |||||||
| 15 | Did not play | 2% | 0% | – | |||||||
| Total | 46.636.125.6 | 45 | 21 | 264 | 0 | 0 | – | ||||
2008 game log
| Receiving | Other | In real leagues | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | Did not play | 66% | 29% | 38% | |||||||
| 2 | 19.317.315.3 | ––– | – | 4 | 153 | 0 | 0 | – | 50% | 15% | 50% |
| 3 | 9.98.97.9 | ––– | – | 2 | 19 | 1 | 0 | – | 76% | 56% | 55% |
| 4 | 16.413.911.4 | ––– | – | 5 | 54 | 1 | 0 | – | 86% | 74% | 50% |
| 5 | 19.918.416.9 | ––– | – | 3 | 49 | 2 | 0 | – | 89% | 59% | 62% |
| 6 | 4.83.82.8 | ––– | – | 2 | 28 | 0 | 0 | – | 95% | 69% | 40% |
| 7 | 7.76.24.7 | ––– | – | 3 | 47 | 0 | 0 | – | 95% | 59% | 44% |
| 8 | 8.96.94.9 | ––– | – | 4 | 49 | 0 | 0 | – | 93% | 69% | 46% |
| 9 | Did not play | 82% | 4% | 16% | |||||||
| 10 | 2.21.71.2 | ––– | – | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | – | 82% | 43% | 42% |
| 11 | 2.72.21.7 | ––– | – | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | – | 74% | 26% | 32% |
| 12 | 26.522.518.5 | ––– | – | 8 | 125 | 1 | 0 | – | 69% | 17% | 61% |
| 13 | 17.715.212.7 | ––– | – | 5 | 67 | 1 | 0 | – | 78% | 31% | 51% |
| 14 | 13.010.07.0 | ––– | – | 6 | 70 | 0 | 0 | – | 61% | 39% | 41% |
| 15 | 14.110.67.1 | ––– | – | 7 | 71 | 0 | 0 | – | 55% | 46% | 45% |
| 16 | 19.115.612.1 | ––– | – | 7 | 61 | 1 | 0 | – | 52% | 58% | 56% |
| 17 | 2.81.80.8 | ––– | – | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | – | 53% | 53% | 45% |
| Total | 185.0155.0125.0 | – | 60 | 833 | 7 | 0 | – | ||||
2007 game log
| Receiving | Other | In real leagues | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 5.03.52.0 | ––– | – | 3 | 20 | 0 | 0 | – | 89% | 37% | 43% |
| 2 | 22.218.214.2 | ––– | – | 8 | 145 | 0 | 0 | – | 85% | 30% | 58% |
| 3 | 4.42.91.4 | ––– | – | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0 | – | 90% | 49% | 42% |
| 4 | 3.42.92.4 | ––– | – | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | – | 80% | 48% | 42% |
| 5 | Did not play | 55% | 16% | 40% | |||||||
| 6 | Did not play | 42% | 13% | 32% | |||||||
| 7 | 7.26.25.2 | ––– | – | 2 | 52 | 0 | 0 | – | 44% | 37% | 32% |
| 8 | 13.010.07.0 | ––– | – | 6 | 70 | 0 | 0 | – | 45% | 51% | 41% |
| 9 | Did not play | 42% | 5% | – | |||||||
| 10 | 16.114.112.1 | ––– | – | 4 | 62 | 1 | 0 | – | 46% | 48% | 49% |
| 11 | 10.47.95.4 | ––– | – | 5 | 54 | 0 | 0 | – | 50% | 34% | 37% |
| 12 | 18.315.312.3 | ––– | – | 6 | 63 | 1 | 0 | – | 49% | 33% | 40% |
| 13 | 13.111.19.1 | ––– | – | 4 | 31 | 1 | 0 | – | 55% | 46% | 50% |
| 14 | Did not play | 40% | 45% | 40% | |||||||
| 15 | 11.29.27.2 | ––– | – | 4 | 72 | 0 | 0 | – | 32% | 30% | 43% |
| 16 | 21.718.214.7 | ––– | – | 7 | 87 | 1 | 0 | – | 28% | 32% | 40% |
| 17 | 5.94.93.9 | ––– | – | 2 | 39 | 0 | 0 | – | 37% | 70% | 43% |
| Total | 151.9124.496.9 | – | 55 | 733 | 4 | 0 | – | ||||
2006 game log
| Receiving | Other | In real leagues | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 11.48.96.4 | ––– | – | 5 | 64 | 0 | 0 | – | 78% | 33% | 46% |
| 2 | 12.710.27.7 | ––– | – | 5 | 77 | 0 | 0 | – | 82% | 62% | 45% |
| 3 | 10.99.47.9 | ––– | – | 3 | 79 | 0 | 0 | – | 84% | 63% | 42% |
| 4 | 25.021.518.0 | ––– | – | 7 | 100 | 1 | 0 | – | 83% | 63% | 61% |
| 5 | 4.33.32.3 | ––– | – | 2 | 23 | 0 | 0 | – | 93% | 84% | 37% |
| 6 | 9.57.04.5 | ––– | – | 5 | 45 | 0 | 0 | – | 92% | 70% | 42% |
| 7 | Did not play | 86% | 3% | – | |||||||
| 8 | 15.513.010.5 | ––– | – | 5 | 105 | 0 | 0 | – | 89% | 46% | 54% |
| 9 | 9.17.66.1 | ––– | – | 3 | 61 | 0 | 0 | – | 94% | 69% | 41% |
| 10 | 13.610.16.6 | ––– | – | 7 | 66 | 0 | 0 | – | 93% | 55% | 40% |
| 11 | 1.61.10.6 | ––– | – | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | – | 92% | 49% | 39% |
| 12 | 12.39.36.3 | ––– | – | 6 | 63 | 0 | 0 | – | 90% | 46% | 45% |
| 13 | 18.516.013.5 | ––– | – | 5 | 75 | 1 | 0 | – | 89% | 51% | 58% |
| 14 | 10.28.26.2 | ––– | – | 4 | 62 | 0 | 0 | – | 64% | 29% | 46% |
| 15 | 8.87.35.8 | ––– | – | 3 | 58 | 0 | 0 | – | 56% | 37% | 49% |
| 16 | 29.825.320.8 | ––– | – | 9 | 148 | 1 | 0 | – | 50% | 41% | 64% |
| 17 | 10.68.66.6 | ––– | – | 4 | 66 | 0 | 0 | – | 50% | 57% | 57% |
| Total | 203.8166.8129.8 | – | 74 | 1,098 | 3 | 0 | – | ||||
2005 game log
| Receiving | Other | In real leagues | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 15.113.612.1 | ––– | – | 3 | 61 | 1 | 0 | – | 100% | 89% | 58% |
| 2 | 11.48.96.4 | ––– | – | 5 | 64 | 0 | 0 | – | 100% | 86% | 48% |
| 3 | 2.11.61.1 | ––– | – | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | – | 99% | 86% | 38% |
| 4 | Did not play | 96% | 16% | 34% | |||||||
| 5 | Did not play | 85% | 12% | 48% | |||||||
| 6 | Did not play | 82% | 8% | 18% | |||||||
| 7 | Did not play | 79% | 10% | 32% | |||||||
| 8 | Did not play | 75% | 7% | – | |||||||
| 9 | Did not play | 77% | 4% | – | |||||||
| 10 | 2.62.11.6 | ––– | – | 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | – | 83% | 36% | 39% |
| 11 | 18.316.314.3 | ––– | – | 4 | 83 | 1 | 0 | – | 85% | 41% | 61% |
| 12 | 19.417.415.4 | ––– | – | 4 | 94 | 1 | 0 | – | 88% | 57% | 62% |
| 13 | 7.35.33.3 | ––– | – | 4 | 33 | 0 | 0 | – | 93% | 63% | 43% |
| 14 | 11.69.16.6 | ––– | – | 5 | 66 | 0 | 0 | – | 74% | 58% | 46% |
| 15 | 3.62.61.6 | ––– | – | 2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | – | 61% | 51% | 40% |
| 16 | 13.310.37.3 | ––– | – | 6 | 73 | 0 | 0 | – | 54% | 47% | 47% |
| 17 | 1.81.30.8 | ––– | – | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | – | 54% | 34% | – |
| Total | 106.588.570.5 | – | 36 | 525 | 3 | 0 | – | ||||
2004 game log
| Receiving | Other | In real leagues | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Points | Finish | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Fum lost | Snap % | Rostered | Started | Team won |
| 1 | 26.221.717.2 | ––– | – | 9 | 112 | 1 | 0 | – | 99% | 81% | 67% |
| 2 | 18.214.210.2 | ––– | – | 8 | 102 | 0 | 0 | – | 99% | 92% | 54% |
| 3 | 21.417.413.4 | ––– | – | 8 | 134 | 0 | 0 | – | 100% | 96% | 50% |
| 4 | 17.013.510.0 | ––– | – | 7 | 100 | 0 | 0 | – | 100% | 99% | 56% |
| 5 | 13.810.87.8 | ––– | – | 6 | 78 | 0 | 0 | – | 100% | 97% | 47% |
| 6 | 2.11.61.1 | ––– | – | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | – | 100% | 97% | 45% |
| 7 | 14.812.39.8 | ––– | – | 5 | 98 | 0 | 0 | – | 99% | 88% | 56% |
| 8 | Did not play | 99% | 10% | 38% | |||||||
| 9 | 15.913.911.9 | ––– | – | 4 | 59 | 1 | 0 | – | 99% | 89% | 48% |
| 10 | 15.411.98.4 | ––– | – | 7 | 104 | 0 | 1 | – | 99% | 92% | 49% |
| 11 | 14.813.311.8 | ––– | – | 3 | 58 | 1 | 0 | – | 100% | 92% | 62% |
| 12 | 28.023.519.0 | ––– | – | 9 | 170 | 1 | 2 | – | 100% | 91% | 63% |
| 13 | 3.82.81.8 | ––– | – | 2 | 18 | 0 | 0 | – | 99% | 95% | 45% |
| 14 | 5.74.22.7 | ––– | – | 3 | 27 | 0 | 0 | – | 92% | 80% | 38% |
| 15 | 7.75.73.7 | ––– | – | 4 | 37 | 0 | 0 | – | 80% | 75% | 42% |
| 16 | 23.819.815.8 | ––– | – | 8 | 98 | 1 | 0 | – | 78% | 70% | 55% |
| 17 | 17.615.112.6 | ––– | – | 5 | 86 | 1 | 1 | – | 82% | 83% | 58% |
| Total | 246.2201.7157.2 | – | 89 | 1,292 | 6 | 4 | – | ||||
ROSTER %
How real leagues use Isaac Bruce
Rostered and started, week by week
Share of real leagues.
| Season | Rostered | Started | Team won when he started |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 21% | 28% | 40% |
| 2008 | 78% | 45% | 47% |
| 2007 | 58% | 36% | 43% |
| 2006 | 86% | 52% | 45% |
| 2005 | 87% | 43% | 48% |
| 2004 | 99% | 86% | 52% |
Average week, weeks 1 to 14.
THE DRAFT
Where Isaac Bruce goes in real drafts
Where Isaac Bruce actually went in real redraft leagues each season, not mock drafts. Picks are 12-team equivalents (round.pick) so every league size lines up. In 2009 he went at 14.03. He went earliest on Yahoo (14.03) and latest on ESPN (14.05): each site's default rankings move real drafts.
ADP by season
12-team equivalent pick in real redraft leagues. Higher is earlier.
ADP by site
| Season | All sites | Drafted in | Yahoo | ESPN | MyFantasyLeague |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 14.03 | 36% | 14.03 | 14.05 | – |
| 2008 | 12.12 | 66% | 13.02 | 12.08 | 12.02 |
| 2007 | 11.04 | 86% | 11.05 | 10.10 | – |
| 2006 | 11.10 | 73% | 11.11 | 11.02 | – |
| 2005 | 7.06 | 87% | 7.07 | 7.10 | – |
| 2004 | 7.03 | 86% | 7.05 | – | – |
ADP by scoring format
| Season | PPR | Half PPR | Standard | Standard superflex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 14.09 | 14.03 | 13.06 | – |
| 2008 | 12.02 | 12.09 | 12.11 | – |
| 2007 | 10.07 | 10.09 | 11.04 | 13.03 |
| 2006 | 11.06 | – | 11.09 | – |
| 2005 | 6.12 | – | 7.07 | – |
| 2004 | 6.12 | – | 7.01 | – |
Average pick by league size
| Season | 8 teams | 10 teams | 12 teams | 14 teams |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | – | 142.9 | 156.8 | 169.7 |
| 2008 | 119.8 | 129.1 | 136.6 | 143.3 |
| 2007 | 104.4 | 108.8 | 113.9 | 107.8 |
| 2006 | 106.3 | 116.8 | 122.6 | 114.5 |
| 2005 | 71.8 | 64.5 | 70.2 | 67.7 |
| 2004 | 68.1 | 62.3 | 67.3 | – |
The overall pick he went at in leagues of each size, not converted to 12 teams.
THE PAYOFF
Did drafting Isaac Bruce pay off?
How the teams that drafted Isaac Bruce finished, every season. In 2009 they won 6.9% of league titles, against 8.7% for a random team in the same leagues, and made the playoffs 51% of the time.
Title rate vs. a random team
Teams that drafted him, each finished season.
| Season | Won the title | Made playoffs | Team win % | Of champions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 7% | 51% | 48% | 0% |
| 2008 | 9% | 49% | 50% | 8% |
| 2007 | 8% | 46% | 47% | 4% |
| 2006 | 9% | 48% | 48% | 6% |
| 2005 | 10% | 52% | 48% | 6% |
| 2004 | 12% | 62% | 52% | 12% |
The gold tick on each bar is the title rate for any team in those leagues (one in the league's size). "Of champions" is the share of league champions with him on their roster in the title week.
Title rate by scoring format
| Season | PPR | Half PPR | Standard | Standard superflex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 6.4% | 2.5% | 9.8% | – |
| 2008 | 6.7% | 10.2% | 8.2% | – |
| 2007 | 4.8% | 9.8% | 7.8% | 4.3% |
| 2006 | 10.0% | – | 7.5% | – |
| 2005 | 10.3% | – | 12.2% | – |
| 2004 | 20.8% | – | 9.8% | – |
Green beat the one-in-league-size baseline by 15% or more, amber trailed it.
THE WIRE
Trades and waivers
The share of leagues where Isaac Bruce was traded, picked up or dropped at some point in the season. He was traded in 2% of leagues in 2009.
| Season | Traded in | Busiest trade week | Added in | Dropped in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2% | Week 1 | 26% | 55% |
| 2008 | 8% | Week 7 | 68% | 59% |
| 2007 | 6% | Week 5 | 54% | 76% |
| 2006 | 15% | Week 8 | 43% | 37% |
| 2005 | 14% | Week 8 | 39% | 46% |
| 2004 | 19% | Week 8 | 3% | 3% |
Out of every league that season. A league counts once however many times he moved, and preseason moves count.
Common questions
What is Isaac Bruce's ADP?
In 2009 redraft leagues, Isaac Bruce went at 14.03 on average, pick 159.0 in a 12-team league. By site: Yahoo 14.03, ESPN 14.05.
Did teams that drafted Isaac Bruce win their league?
In 2009, 6.9% of teams that drafted him won the title, against 8.7% for any team in the same leagues. 0% of league champions had him on their roster in the title week.
What percentage of leagues roster Isaac Bruce?
He was rostered in 21% of leagues in an average week of 2009 (weeks 1–14), and managers started him 28% of the time.
How often is Isaac Bruce traded in fantasy?
He was traded in 2% of leagues in 2009.
Where do these numbers come from?
From real fantasy leagues connected to Fantasy Hall of Fame from Yahoo, Sleeper, ESPN, CBS, MFL, Fleaflicker and Fantrax: their drafts, weekly lineups, transactions and final standings. Every number covers at least 20 leagues; no league or manager is identified.